crwdns2933423:0crwdne2933423:0

The 2013 revamp of the desktop Mac series known as the Mac Pro.

crwdns2934591:0117crwdne2934591:0 crwdns2934593:0crwdne2934593:0

Upgrade Mac Pro Late 2013 CPU with Core i7-6900K

Is it possible to put a Core i7-6900K into a Mac Pro Late 2013?

That's the one:

http://ark.intel.com/products/94196/Inte...

If not, is there a similar CPU that would work?

crwdns2934081:0crwdne2934081:0 crwdns2934083:0crwdne2934083:0 crwdns2934093:0crwdne2934093:0

crwdns2934109:0crwdne2934109:0

crwdns2889612:0crwdne2889612:0 0
crwdns2942205:01crwdne2942205:0

Just get a E5-2667 V2 for a LGA2011 socket, its the same thing 3.7-4.0 8 Core

crwdns2934271:0crwdnd2934271:0crwdne2934271:0

crwdns2934285:0crwdne2934285:0

crwdns2933313:01crwdne2933313:0

crwdns2934051:0crwdne2934051:0

The correct CPU for your Mac Pro system would be this one: Intel Xeon Processor E5-1680 v2 (25M Cache, 3.00 GHz): 8 Cores - 16 threads. And here is the IFIXIT guide you'll need to follow: Mac Pro Late 2013 CPU Replacement.

crwdns2934105:0crwdne2934105:0

crwdns2889612:0crwdne2889612:0 2

crwdns2944067:015crwdne2944067:0:

What do you mean by correct? Would the CPU that I showed work in the Mac Pro? It's the same socket.

crwdns2934271:0crwdnd2934271:0crwdne2934271:0

Sorry no, the chip you selected requires the newer rev of the socket: FCLGA2011-3 Vs FCLGA2011 the Mac Pro system has.

crwdns2934271:0crwdnd2934271:0crwdne2934271:0

Ahh, that makes sense thank you. But how can these Benchmarks exist then?

http://browser.primatelabs.com/v4/cpu/se...

Is there a consumer class (cheaper) 8-core that would work with the Mac Pro 2013?

crwdns2934271:0crwdnd2934271:0crwdne2934271:0

Confusion! GeekBench does not report the Mac Pro Xeon series chips correctly MacPro6.1.

The rub here is the ID string within the chip is the same as the i Series.

As to a cheaper CPU option only the lower end Xeon (3.7 GHz Quad Core Xeon E5-1620v2). Remember this is a Pro's class box not a consumer class box.

crwdns2934271:0crwdnd2934271:0crwdne2934271:0

Ahh! Now that is interesting. Well, I need it for C++ programming in Xcode and I'm hoping for faster compile times and better responsiveness (of the Xcode UI). I'm currently torn between an iMac 2015 and a Mac Pro with upgraded CPU. Geekbench says that the iMac 2015 (with 4.0 GHz CPU) has a higher score, while being a lot cheaper.

Is there something I miss?

crwdns2934271:0crwdnd2934271:0crwdne2934271:0

crwdns2934275:010crwdne2934275:0

crwdns2934285:0crwdne2934285:0

crwdns2934229:0crwdne2934229:0

Max crwdns2934231:0crwdne2934231:0
crwdns2936625:0crwdne2936625:0:

crwdns2936751:024crwdne2936751:0 0

crwdns2936753:07crwdne2936753:0 2

crwdns2936753:030crwdne2936753:0 10

crwdns2942667:0crwdne2942667:0 4,918