crwdns2933803:02crwdne2933803:0
crwdns2933797:0Tony Goncalvescrwdnd2933797:0crwdne2933797:0
crwdns2936043:0crwdne2936043:0 crwdns2933505:0crwdne2933505:0 Evan Noronha
- crwdns2933769:0crwdne2933769:0
- crwdns2933771:0crwdne2933771:0
- crwdns2933801:0crwdne2933801:0
crwdns2933807:0crwdne2933807:0
[* black] We grabbed a GoPro Hero3+ for comparison; here's what we found: | |
[* black] [link|http://i.imgur.com/JVQ2Bjc.gif|Same|new_window=true] weight: 74 g. | |
- | [* black] Almost the [link|http://i.imgur.com/C8nWZej.gif|same|new_window=true] ports. Both feature microSD |
+ | [* black] Almost the [link|http://i.imgur.com/C8nWZej.gif|same|new_window=true] ports. Both feature microSD, but the Session moves up to micro-USB instead of mini-USB, and drops the accessory port of traditional GoPros. |
[* icon_note] The Session also hides its ports under a water-sealed hinged door, while the 3+ keeps its ports under a pop-out door that we took out and lost. | |
[* black] Very [link|http://i.imgur.com/ZQpVOPB.gif|similar|new_window=true] volume! By our rough understanding of geometry, both the Hero3+ and the Session are just over 50 cubic centimeters in volume. | |
[* icon_note] So is it actually fair to call the Session ''smaller''? Yes. Waterproofing the camera lets users ditch the bulky case, which more than triples the volume of traditional GoPros. |