crwdns2933423:0crwdne2933423:0

crwdns2933803:010crwdne2933803:0

crwdns2933797:0Walter Galancrwdnd2933797:0crwdne2933797:0

crwdns2936043:0crwdne2936043:0 crwdns2933505:0crwdne2933505:0 Walter Galan

crwdns2933769:0crwdne2933769:0
crwdns2933771:0crwdne2933771:0
crwdns2933801:0crwdne2933801:0

crwdns2933807:0crwdne2933807:0

[* icon_note] Talk around the water cooler is that the Moto 360 suffers from an [link|http://gizmodo.com/moto-360-hands-on-the-one-weve-been-waiting-for-proba-1630875506|abysmal battery life|new_window=true].
[* black] Let's compare battery life with its two competitors, the Samsung Gear Live and the LG G Watch:
[* red] Motorola Moto 360: 3.8 V, 300 mAh battery rated at 1.1 Wh of energy.
[* orange] Samsung Gear Live: 3.8 V, 300 mAh battery rated at 1.14 Wh of energy.
[* yellow] LG G Watch: 3.8 V, 400 mAh battery rated at 1.5 Wh of energy.
+[* black] Unfortunately we cannot speak as to the actual battery performance. However, given the fact that all three are 1st generation Android Gear smartwatches, it's not surprising that the battery ratings are similar.