crwdns2933803:08crwdne2933803:0
crwdns2933797:0David Husolocrwdnd2933797:0crwdne2933797:0
crwdns2936043:0crwdne2936043:0 crwdns2933505:0crwdne2933505:0 David Husolo
- crwdns2933769:0crwdne2933769:0
- crwdns2933771:0crwdne2933771:0
- crwdns2933801:0crwdne2933801:0
crwdns2933807:0crwdne2933807:0
- | [title] Belt Tension |
---|---|
- | [* black] With a CoreXY you can also use Klipper to compare belt tension between X and Y. |
+ | [title] Comparing Belt Tension |
+ | [* black] With a CoreXY you can also use Klipper to compare belt tension between X and Y. This doesn't tell you if the belts are too tight or too loose. It tells you have the belts are tensioned equally. |
[* black] Run the following commands in the console | |
[* orange] TEST_RESONANCES AXIS=1,1 OUTPUT=raw_data | |
[* light_blue] TEST_RESONANCES AXIS=1,-1 OUTPUT=raw_data | |
[* black] SSH into the pi and run | |
[* black] ~/klipper/scripts/graph_accelerometer.py -c /tmp/raw_data_axis*.csv -o /tmp/resonances.png | |
[* black] Based off the generated graph, X had much higher frequencies than Y. I had to tighten the left belt tensioner to to bring the frequencies closer to each other. | |
[* black] As you can see from the 2nd test the frequencies for X and Y are closer together, but could still use a little more adjustment. I think a lot of the frequency variation is due to my cable chain. At lower frequencies it rattles considerably more only when calibrating X. |