crwdns2933803:07crwdne2933803:0
crwdns2933797:0Jeff Suovanencrwdnd2933797:0crwdne2933797:0
crwdns2936043:0crwdne2936043:0 crwdns2933505:0crwdne2933505:0 Jeff Suovanen
- crwdns2933769:0crwdne2933769:0
- crwdns2933771:0crwdne2933771:0
- crwdns2933801:0crwdne2933801:0
crwdns2933807:0crwdne2933807:0
| - | [* black] Secured with only mild adhesive we can dig out the energy source of the Watch3 without using any heat (granted the [https://youtu.be/OxjMuRyPn3Q?t=44|90° F / 32° C|new_window=true] weather may have helped). |
|---|---|
| - | [* black] This little friend is rated at a sober 1.27 Wh (330 mAh @ 3.85 V)—Samsung doesn't seem concerned with winning the smartwatch battery capacity game. |
| - | [* icon_note] This puts it behind the [guide|117519|original Galaxy Watch|stepid=229559|new_window=true] (1.81 Wh), and the [guide|124018|Huawei Watch GT|stepid=239797|new_window=true] (1.56 Wh), but still ahead of the [guide|126205|Apple Watch Series 5|stepid=243600|new_window=true] (1.129 Wh). |
| + | [* black] Only mild adhesive secures the battery pack, which we can dig out without using any heat. (Granted, the [https://youtu.be/OxjMuRyPn3Q?t=44|90° F / 32° C|new_window=true] weather here may have helped). |
| + | [* black] Our little friend is rated at a sober 1.27 Wh (330 mAh @ 3.85 V)—but with a claimed 2-day battery life, maybe Samsung just isn't concerned about winning the smartwatch battery spec war. |
| + | [* icon_note] This puts it behind the [guide|117519|original Galaxy Watch|stepid=229559|new_window=true] (1.81 Wh), and the [guide|124018|Huawei Watch GT|stepid=239797|new_window=true] (1.56 Wh), but still ahead of the [guide|126205|Apple Watch Series 5 44 mm|stepid=243600|new_window=true] (1.129 Wh). |
| + | [* black] We half expected to find a novel battery design with a [https://www.ifixit.com/News/33157/40mm-apple-watch-series-5-new-battery-design|metal pouch|new_window=true]—but so far, Apple seems to be the only watchmaker experimenting with that. |