crwdns2933803:08crwdne2933803:0
crwdns2933797:0Arthur Shicrwdnd2933797:0crwdne2933797:0
crwdns2936043:0crwdne2936043:0 crwdns2933505:0crwdne2933505:0 Arthur Shi
- crwdns2933769:0crwdne2933769:0
- crwdns2933771:0crwdne2933771:0
- crwdns2933801:0crwdne2933801:0
crwdns2933807:0crwdne2933807:0
| [* black] Between us and the (heat-sensitive) battery is a moat of white, rubbery, alcohol-resistant adhesive. Left with no other options, we carefully begin manual excavation. | |
| [* black] Picking around this little bomb is what you call EOP (Explosive Ordnance Paleontology). Well, okay, we might be the only ones who [guide|121471|call it that|stepid=233898|new_window=true]. | |
| [* black] The battery is tethered by a soldered cable—so even though you can ''get'' to it, it's still not easily replaceable at this point. | |
| [* black] Hey wait, this looks familiar—could this be the same battery that we found in the [guide|120693|Galaxy Buds|new_window=true]? | |
| [* icon_note] They're both German-made, lithium-ion button cells running at 3.7 V—but the Galaxy Buds' (slightly larger) battery reads CP1254, while the one in the AirPods Pro is labeled CP1154. | |
| + | [* black] Physically, the CP1154 has 14% less volume than the 200 mWh CP1254. With the power of math, we ''estimate'' that this battery packs ~168 mWh. |
| + | [* icon_note] This is a huge boost from the [guide|121471|93 mWh cylindrical batteries|new_window=true] in the AirPods 2, and is closer to its pro kin, the [guide|124042|PowerBeats Pro|new_window=true]. |