crwdns2933803:013crwdne2933803:0
crwdns2933797:0David Hodsoncrwdnd2933797:0crwdne2933797:0
crwdns2936043:0crwdne2936043:0 crwdns2933505:0crwdne2933505:0 David Hodson
- crwdns2933769:0crwdne2933769:0
- crwdns2933771:0crwdne2933771:0
- crwdns2933801:0crwdne2933801:0
crwdns2933807:0crwdne2933807:0
| [* black] Next out is the front-facing (and only) camera. | |
| - | [* black] As per usual, a number of folks are complaining about the lack of a rear-facing camera. We're left a little puzzled as to why this is such a deal-breaker, considering [http://xaxor.com/funny-pics/35895-funny-people-taking-photos-with-an-ipad.html|how funny you look] taking pictures with a tablet. |
| + | [* black] As per usual, a number of folks are complaining about the lack of a rear-facing camera on the Kindle Fire HD. We're left a little puzzled as to why this is such a deal-breaker, considering [http://xaxor.com/funny-pics/35895-funny-people-taking-photos-with-an-ipad.html|how funny you look] taking pictures with a tablet. |
| [* black] Amazon doesn't publish the resolution of this camera, and rather states that it is an "HD camera." | |
| [* black] Assuming that the camera captures images in the Kindle Fire HD's native resolution of 1280x800 pixels, that would be a whopping 1.5 megapixels—nothing worth writing home about. | |
| [* icon_caution] This is solely speculation, and we would have to get our hands on an image captured with the Kindle to say for sure what the camera's resolution is. |