Just now put the box back into service. Verified that the fresh food is circulating cold air and the freezer is getting cold; quickly... :0)
Discovered that the thermodisc insertion point has more than one place for it to be inserted; see this picture:
[image|3617310]
-
The ghost of the thermodisc is inside the circle (dark area where the original thermodisc was positioned) and apparently the engineer(s) wisely thought that the upper position may be too high bc that position is right next to the calrod, so they provided optons. The upper position would definitely shorten the defrost cycle as would the specs on the original thermodisc (see above). Of course the attempt at balancing the heat/short timing was done to create the specs that to make it look efficient (failed). The bad news is that none of those concerns are referenced in the service document.
+
The ghost of the thermodisc is inside the circle (dark area where the original thermodisc was positioned) and apparently the engineer(s) wisely thought that the upper position may be too high bc that position is right next to the calrod, so they provided options. The upper position would definitely shorten the defrost cycle as would the specs on the original thermodisc (see above). Of course the attempt at balancing the heat/short timing was done to create the specs that to make it look efficient (failed). The bad news is that none of those concerns are referenced in the service document.
BTW, the picture was taken with a mirror as there is no room back there for focusing a camera. The reverse mirror image was straightened out with Photoshop and the fresh food wall is on the left in that picture.
Just now put the box back into service. Verified that the fresh food is circulating cold air and the freezer is getting cold; quickly... :0)
Discovered that the thermodisc insertion point has more than one place for it to be inserted; see this picture:
[image|3617310]
-
The ghost of the thermodisc is inside the circle (dark area where the original thermodisc was positioned) and apparently the engineer(s) wisely thought that the upper position may be too high bc that position is right next to the calrod, so they provided optons. The upper position would definitely shorten the defrost cycle as would the specs on the original thermodisc (see above). Of course the attempt at balancing the heat/short timing was done to create the specs that made it look efficient (failed). The bad news is that none of those concerns are referenced in the service document.
+
The ghost of the thermodisc is inside the circle (dark area where the original thermodisc was positioned) and apparently the engineer(s) wisely thought that the upper position may be too high bc that position is right next to the calrod, so they provided optons. The upper position would definitely shorten the defrost cycle as would the specs on the original thermodisc (see above). Of course the attempt at balancing the heat/short timing was done to create the specs that to make it look efficient (failed). The bad news is that none of those concerns are referenced in the service document.
BTW, the picture was taken with a mirror as there is no room back there for focusing a camera. The reverse mirror image was straightened out with Photoshop and the fresh food wall is on the left in that picture.
Just now put the box back into service. Verified that the fresh food is circulating cold air and the freezer is getting cold; quickly... :0)
Discovered that the thermodisc insertion point has more than one place for it to be inserted; see this picture:
[image|3617310]
The ghost of the thermodisc is inside the circle (dark area where the original thermodisc was positioned) and apparently the engineer(s) wisely thought that the upper position may be too high bc that position is right next to the calrod, so they provided optons. The upper position would definitely shorten the defrost cycle as would the specs on the original thermodisc (see above). Of course the attempt at balancing the heat/short timing was done to create the specs that made it look efficient (failed). The bad news is that none of those concerns are referenced in the service document.
BTW, the picture was taken with a mirror as there is no room back there for focusing a camera. The reverse mirror image was straightened out with Photoshop and the fresh food wall is on the left in that picture.
We'll see how this goes...